That design constraint shapes every decision below.
Where the deck actually goes. A partner pastes a confidential deck into a personal AI tool to extract the takeaways. It now lives in their personal chat history on a personal account under settings nobody at the firm chose; the founder never agreed to that.
When the builder leaves. DIY agents belong to the person who built them. When that partner leaves, their workflow leaves along with the chat history.
When the LP asks. Operational due diligence now includes an AI-governance question. 'Each partner runs their own setup' is not an answer that survives the meeting.
GOVERNED BY ARCHITECTURE, NOT BY DISCIPLINE
Everything below exists so none of the above can happen.
Siloed by architecture. The investor and founder sides of Capwave are separate products on separate infrastructure; the pipelines never cross.
Zero training on your data. Your thesis, your notes, your conviction, never training material for others.
Encrypted and access-controlled. One encrypted store with centralized keys and permissions, creating an audit trail of what ran and when.
Shared by design. One deal sheet, one to-do list, one set of files for the whole firm.
Cited, never guessed. Every claim traced to your documents; when data is thin I note the gap.
No lock-in. Export anytime; your own MCP agents keep working.
THE STANDARD AN LP EXPECTS OF YOUR DATA ROOM
Security questions get answered by a founder, not a portal: charlotte@capwave.ai