COMPARE

    Capwave vs building it yourself. Build the memo bot. Buy the memory.

    Capwave exists because the firms that could build this did, and said what it cost. You can wire a model to your inbox in a weekend and get most of the way there. The last part is the part that matters: reading data rooms, citing every number, permissions across a firm, and a memory that survives the person who built it.

    NOTHING SENT WITHOUT YOUR SAY-SOSILOED BY FIRM, ZERO TRAINING ON YOUR DATAEXPORT ANYTIMESecurity ↗
    THE SHORT VERSION

    Two different jobs.

    BUILD

    Right for a firm with engineers on staff and a partner who owns the system. USV built named agents around a firm-wide data model. Theory runs three investors alongside a nine-person intelligence organization.

    BUY

    Right for the firm that wants the result on Tuesday morning: read, scored, briefed, remembered, siloed, exportable, and maintained by someone whose whole job it is.

    BOTH

    Build on top of me. Ask me from your own tools through MCP, export everything, and keep the scripts that are specific to your firm.

    SIDE BY SIDE

    What each path costs.

    Building it yourself
    Capwave
    Time to the first brief
    Building it yourself
    Weeks for a prototype; months for something the whole firm trusts.
    Capwave
    The morning after you connect.
    What reads the documents
    Building it yourself
    Whatever you wire up: usually the email body and an uploaded PDF.
    Capwave
    Every deck, DocSend link, data room and spreadsheet tab that reaches the firm.
    Citations
    Building it yourself
    Yours to build, and the first thing cut when the demo works.
    Capwave
    Every number cited to its source, always.
    Permissions and siloing
    Building it yourself
    Yours to design, test and keep right as the team changes.
    Capwave
    Siloed by firm, per-seat access, export anytime.
    Who maintains it
    Building it yourself
    The person who built it, on top of their real job.
    Capwave
    Me, and a team whose only job this is.
    When the builder leaves
    Building it yourself
    Nobody can maintain it. See Jason Lemkin, below.
    Capwave
    Nothing changes.
    What it costs
    Building it yourself
    An engineer's time for a year, then maintenance forever, plus the model bills.
    Capwave
    $200 a seat a month. Monthly, cancel anytime.
    Lock-in
    Building it yourself
    None, if you keep paying the person.
    Capwave
    None. Export everything, anytime, and read me through MCP.

    Build-side descriptions are general; the quotes below are from firms and builders who have done it, in their own words.

    The morning after 47 decks arrived. This is what the finished version looks like.

    Synced 4mInboxIQ · deal flowJoin call ↗×
    Deal flow · overnight47 decks · 6 data rooms · 3 fits
    DETECT
    deal or noise
    READ
    the deck, the DocSend, the data room, every tab
    SCORE
    against your thesis, every number cited
    ROUTE
    fits to you, pass notes drafted
    Fits today3 of 47
    NovaBio · 92/100
    via Sarah Chen, co-investor
    Series A, oncology infrastructure. Two other funds circling. Data room read: 23 sources.
    Synthara AI · 87/100
    DocSend from the founder
    Ex-DeepMind team, inference cost. 140% NRR, top-decile.
    Bloom Health · 71/100
    your intake page
    Pre-seed. Watch list, not a meeting.
    44 filed: 11 recruiter pings, 2 cold demos, 9 out of thesis, 22 noise. Pass notes drafted in your words, sent on your say-so.
    Who sends you the fitsthis quarter
    Sarah Chen, co-investor · 3 fits, co-invested twice. You owe her one; a draft is waiting.
    Arjun's network (associate) · 2 fits, both pre-seed. Both from his Stripe years.
    Your intake page · 1 fit out of 15. Worth keeping on, not worth reading by hand.
    That is where Thursday goes.
    Source: inbox · attachments · DocSend · data rooms · intake page · co-investor forwards

    Sarver built his for himself; it knows one person. USV and Theory built theirs for the firm, with engineers on staff. I am the firm-wide version for the firms that will not hire an engineering team to get there.

    Public statements, quoted with attribution. Not endorsements.

    THE HONEST VERSION

    Where each one is the right answer.

    WHEN BUILDING IS RIGHT
    You have engineers on staff and a partner who will own the system for years.
    Your process is unusual enough that no product fits it.
    You want the learning, not only the result.
    WHEN BUYING IS RIGHT
    You want it running the morning after you connect.
    Nobody at the firm wants to be the maintainer.
    You need permissions, siloing and export handled by people who do it for a living.
    The person who would build it might leave.
    QUESTIONS

    Questions firms ask.

    Can we build this with ChatGPT and Zapier?

    The memo bot, yes, in a weekend. The memory, no. It needs the inbox, the calendar, the transcripts and the data rooms in one place, read every night, with permissions, citations and someone to keep it running when the person who built it moves on.

    We already built something. Do we throw it away?

    No. Keep it. I export everything and answer through MCP, so your scripts can read me, and the firm-wide memory sits underneath them.

    Are we locked in?

    No. Export anytime, in full.

    THE QUIET EDGE

    Build the memo bot. Buy the memory.

    Invitation only. Book a demo and your invite follows within the week.

    NOTHING SENT WITHOUT YOUR SAY-SOSILOED BY FIRM, ZERO TRAINING ON YOUR DATAEXPORT ANYTIMESecurity ↗